From this examination of the two systems it is evident that the central comparative feature and the most significant factor that allows us to distinguish them, is the highly centralised power vertical system in Russia, and the loosely based network of influential actors in Ukraine who are not necessarily connected to one particular strand of executive power. It is also evident that under certain conditions and when dealing with the certain sectors discussed that both of these different networks have advantages and disadvantages.

 

When dealing with an economic crisis or the consequences of international sanctions, it appears that the interconnectedness and ability to coerce and control of the Russian systems most effective in coordinating a response to dealing with them. And although in theory the new found transparency and attempted implementation of reforms should help to allow the economy to function more efficiently, and even potentially attract outside investment, the fragmented nature of the informal networks in Ukraine makes these reforms difficult to smoothly execute. In contrast, when looking at how Military spending and planning changes in Ukraine have been implemented in the aftermath of the breakout of war, outside pressure and transparency has seemed to positively impact the efficiency of the armed forces, and also helped to minimise corruption within it.

 

In Russia however, the system has failed to stem the misappropriation of funds that were intended for defence of a region that was ultimately invaded and occupied by the Ukrainian armed forces. Heavy investment in the military industrial sector has temporarily eased many of the economic hardships that have been caused by international sanctions, but this has also created an economic illusion of stability whilst depleting funds that have taken years to accumulate. In the energy sector it appears that both systems have problems with dealing with the corruption that derives from their unique features. Although being a massive source of revenue for the Russian government, the lack of transparency of their system and the power of certain individuals and officials in this sector makes it possible for widespread and massive corruption to emerge. In Ukraine it is a similar story, where significant actors have been allowed to monopolise the energy sector whilst also using the substantial rents to but political influence.

 

Overall both systems appear to be fundamental flawed when it comes to dealing with systemic issues of corruption. Although transparency and outside influence has helped ease corruption in certain sectors in Ukraine it is still rife in other sectors. In Russia although the regime does have benefits when it comes to navigating sanctions, or when attempting to coherently implement policy, the interconnectedness of the regime also helps to foster corruption and a lack of accountability and transparency.